Which type of agreement is more likely to have issues related to undue influence?

The type of agreement that is more likely to have issues related to undue influence is a contract between a strong party and a vulnerable party. This is because undue influence arises when one party is in a position of power or superiority over the other and uses that power to influence the other party's decisions or actions to their advantage.

In scenarios where there is a significant disparity in power, knowledge, or experience between the two parties, the weaker party may feel pressured or compelled to agree to terms that they do not fully understand or that are not in their best interest. This can lead to situations where the agreement is not truly voluntary and may be deemed voidable by the influenced party on the grounds of undue influence.

On the other hand, agreements between two equal parties generally do not present such an imbalance, as both parties have similar bargaining power and understanding of the contract. Short-term contracts with minimal stakes also tend to involve less emotional or psychological factors that can lead to undue influence, as the stakes are lower and the interactions are typically more straightforward. Contracts clarified by legal representation are constructed with the guidance of legal professionals, which further protects the parties involved from undue influence and equips them with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions.