Which agreements are considered void due to the nature of their content?

Agreements based on immoral considerations are considered void because they contravene public policy or accepted moral standards. In legal terms, a contract must have a lawful object to be enforceable; if the purpose or content of an agreement is deemed immoral, it is rendered void ab initio, meaning it is treated as if it never existed.

For instance, an agreement to engage in illegal activities, such as drug trafficking or gambling (where prohibited), would be void because it violates societal norms and laws. Courts will not enforce such contracts and will deny any legal remedy associated with them.

In contrast, contracts that involve mutual benefits, ethical agreements, or those with clearly defined terms typically do not breach moral or legal standards and therefore remain valid and enforceable, barring other issues unrelated to their content. This distinction underscores the importance of morality and legality in contract law.