What should be avoided to ensure writing remains relevant in legal contexts?

In legal writing, maintaining relevance is crucial for clarity and precision. Using general references can lead to ambiguity and a lack of specificity, which are detrimental in legal contexts. Legal writing demands precision in language, as it often involves interpreting laws, regulations, and precedents. General references can dilute the argument, making it difficult for readers to understand the specific legal principles or rules being applied.

By avoiding general references, a writer can ensure that every statement is grounded in precise legal terminology or well-defined concepts. This specificity allows legal documents, such as briefs or contracts, to be clear and concise, reducing the likelihood of misinterpretation or disputes.

While providing citations, integrating case law, and discussing multiple areas of law all play important roles in legal writing, they are essential for supporting arguments and demonstrating relevance to particular legal issues. Using these elements effectively can enhance writing, making it more persuasive and authoritative. However, general references detract from that quality by introducing vagueness, which should be avoided in legal contexts.