What limitation was placed on recovery in the Mannuswamy Case?

The Mannuswamy Case established a significant precedent in terms of limitations on recovery in certain legal contexts. In this particular case, the court determined that recovery was limited to a specific percentage of the item's value, which was set at 15%. This ruling reflects the principle that damages awarded must correspond proportionally to the actual loss incurred.

The decision aimed to ensure that claims are not exaggerated and that they adhere to a reasonable standard in relation to the value of the property or item in question. Counsel for litigants must gauge the item’s value accurately to determine the appropriate recovery amount, ensuring compliance with the court's stipulations.

In other contexts or decisions, different percentages might be invoked, or certain claims may face complete rejection. However, in the Mannuswamy Case, the establishment of a 15% cap created a benchmark for how damages should be evaluated and awarded, promoting fairness and reducing the potential for abuse through inflated claims.