What is the main consequence of an agreement being void?

The main consequence of an agreement being void is that it is no longer enforceable. A void agreement is one that is treated as if it never existed in the eyes of the law. This means that neither party can enforce the terms of the agreement against the other, and it has no legal effect.

A void agreement might arise due to various factors, such as the absence of essential elements like capacity or consent, or because it is prohibited by law. Since the agreement lacks the foundation of legality, no party can bring a claim based on it, and courts will not recognize any obligations that were purportedly created by the agreement.

In contrast, other options suggest scenarios where the agreement might still hold some validity or be subject to future actions, which is not the case with void agreements. For example, the idea of binding until a party withdraws implies a temporary nature that does not apply to void agreements. Similarly, the idea that it may still be valid under certain conditions or can only be challenged in court does not align with the definition of a void agreement, as it simply lacks any enforceable status. Thus, the correct understanding is that a void agreement is no longer enforceable, solidifying the rationale for the correct answer.