What is a likely action taken by the aggrieved party upon non-performance?

In the context of contract law, when an aggrieved party experiences non-performance, one of the most likely actions they will take is to initiate contract termination. This step allows the aggrieved party to legally conclude the contract due to the other party's failure to meet their obligations.

Contract termination serves as a formal means of addressing the breach of contract, allowing the aggrieved party to seek remedies such as damages or to enter into a new contract with another party. By pursuing termination, the aggrieved party reaffirms their rights under the contract, which typically includes clear terms regarding performance expectations and the consequences of breach.

While renegotiation of terms could be a potential step, it is less common if there has been a significant breach, as the parties may lack trust in their ability to fulfill a new agreement. Acceptance of performance is also less likely, as acceptance typically indicates that the aggrieved party is willing to accept the performance despite the breach, which contradicts the intent to address non-performance. Lastly, publication of non-compliance may not have a direct legal remedy and generally serves more as a reputational strategy rather than a formal resolution of the contractual issue at hand.