What happens if the terms of a contract are not capable of being performed?

When the terms of a contract are not capable of being performed, the contract is considered unenforceable. This means that the law will not recognize the contract's obligations, and therefore neither party can compel the other to fulfill the terms outlined in the agreement.

A significant aspect of contract law is the requirement for contracts to have terms that are clear, definite, and capable of performance. If the terms are vague or impossible to execute, it undermines the very foundation of what a contract is meant to accomplish. As such, the courts decline to enforce such agreements, which renders them unenforceable.

In contrast to the other options, maintaining the contract's validity or allowing for renegotiation does not apply when the specific terms cannot be performed. A voidable contract indicates that one party has the right to affirm or reject it due to issues like misrepresentation or undue influence, which is different from lacking performance capability. The distinction is crucial in understanding the circumstances under which a contract can still hold weight legally.