In which case was acceptance considered to be express or implied?

In the context of contract law, acceptance can be considered either express or implied based on the conduct of the parties involved. In the case of Lilly White vs. Unknown, acceptance was recognized through the actions of the parties rather than through explicit communication.

In this case, the conduct of the parties indicated their acceptance of the terms of the contract, illustrating that a mutual agreement can be established even when one party does not state their acceptance outright. This recognition of acceptance being implied highlights the importance of actions and behaviors in establishing mutual consent in contractual relationships.

Other cases may deal with acceptance differently, focusing on explicit declarations or specific forms of communication. However, Lilly White vs. Unknown emphasized how the behaviors and circumstances surrounding the interactions between the parties can lead to an implied acceptance, reinforcing the idea that acceptance does not always require a formal acknowledgment. This understanding is crucial in contract law as it shows that acceptance can manifest in various forms, depending on the context and actions of the individuals involved.